Education is one of the Trump campaign's important positions
Until November 9, 2016, I never imagined there would be any reason to consider what Donald Trump had in mind for education in the USA. I was surprised to see that “Education” was one of sixteen important “positions” on the Trump campaign website which has now been dismantled in favour of https://www.donaldjtrump.com (This post is updated from my original comments on November 10, 2016.)The Trump plan has only one theme: choice
The Trump vision for education has one theme: “choice.” I have to admit I find “choice” to be a very appealing notion in education, in particular because it necessarily implies variety. (Singular, silver-bullet solutions in education seem to inevitably produce more problems than solutions. See "Everything Works!") In the Trump plan, “choice” means “public or private schools,” “magnet schools and charter schools.”
What does "choice" mean in practice?
Each of these varieties of education carries its own particular baggage and connotation. After he had spent three torturous and tedious years at a public high school which enjoyed an ambience somewhere between a gulag and maximum-security prison, my son finally agreed to transfer to a private school. Private schools are incredibly expensive, but the best money I’ve ever spent on anything. Short version, private schools = big money. “Magnet schools” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet_school) are associated with the early days of desegregation and “busing”; meaning inner-city Afro-American kids being bused long distances out to the suburbs—a situation no-body liked apparently. Anyone with any inking about “charter schools” can predict exactly where the Trump plan is heading—the defunding and dismantling of public education. When I googled “charter schools,” three of the first four hits to come up were ads for the CSUSA Corporation: http://www.charterschoolsusa.com.
K-12 education modeled on Trump University
The Trump vision is to turn K-12 education over to the for-profit business sector. In other words, kindergartens, grade schools and high schools in the USA will become versions of the now-defunct Trump University which, post-election,was still on trial for defrauding students. The campaign web site provides a talking-points road map for how to get to for-profit education.Are CEOs of charter school corporations about to get $20 billion richer?
Step one, sentence one, of the “Trump Vision”: “Immediately add an additional federal investment of $20 billion towards school choice.” Kinda sounds good, if you don’t actually read the words. The promise is not to add “$20 billion” to education, the money is going to “school choice” which sort of sounds like the money is going to end up in the pockets of the CEOs of the aforementioned corporations.Is the plan to add $20 billion or cut $20 billion from education?
Where is the money coming from you might ask? Sentence two: “This will be done by reprioritizing existing federal dollars.” If you are familiar with how to read political bureaucratize, you will know to translate this sentence as “No-one knows” or, more to the point, "We're not saying." Unfortunately, the most logical possibility is that the money will come out of existing education budgets. Just in case you thought, as I did on first reading, that Trump would add $20 billion to the education budget, he is most likely (though no one knows for sure) promising to cut $20 billion from public education.
$24 billion cut from education for the poor and disabled?
On the other hand, it’s pretty hard to argue with Trump’s vision and his plan to “Establish the national goal of providing school choice to every one of the 11 million school aged [sic: school-aged] children living in poverty.” Before we get too excited about Trump’s “vision” we should note that this is a rehash of a Republican plan presented in January, 2014.Sens. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), a former education secretary, and Tim Scott (S.C.), one of only two African Americans in the Senate, will propose far-reaching “choice” legislation on Tuesday that would take the $24 billion in federal money spent annually to help educate 11 million students in poverty or with disabilities and convert it into block grants to the states, among other changes. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/gop-measure-would-promote-school-choice-with-federal-funding/2014/01/27/7fd52e7e-8778-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html)
Oh, oh! Could Trump’s reprioritized, “additional $20 billion,” actually be the money now being spent on the poor and the disabled?
