I Used to Think that Pierre Poilieve Was a Really Smart Guy that I Didn't Like Very Much

I decided that Pierre Poilieve was a nasty piece of work when he was casting aspersions on the character and credibility of the former Governor General of Canada, David Johnson. When Johnson was tasked with investigating claims of foreign interference in Canadian elections, Poilieve attempted to discredit him with sleazy, spurious, guilt-by-association claims that he was susceptible to corruption because he and Justin Trudeau owned neighbouring cottages.

Talk about karma!

After his having made such a fuss about foreign interference in Canadian elections, CSIS (Canadian Security and Intelligence Service) now has evidence that Poilieve's Conservative leadership campaign received illegal funding from India. Poilieve could have been informed of what CSIS discovered and gotten in front of the accusations but, to everyone's mystification, Poilieve has refused to go through the process of getting security clearance which would allow him to access intelligence gathering.  Poilieve's justification for refusing to get security clearance is so profoundly dumb, it is difficult to fathom.  In a nutshell his argument is "ignorance is truth" (a slogan from the novel 1984?).  He is attempting to claim that he would not be able to be honest and transparent with the Canadian electorate if he had access to top-secret intelligence.  He can only be honest if he remains ignorant.  He can only tell the truth if he doesn't know what he is talking about.  (Read those sentences again. I wrote them, and I don't get it.)  Poilieve couldn't possibly do a better job of creating the impression that he has something to hide than refusing to be vetted for a security clearance.

Then There's the double standard!

Poilieve brushes off the fact that his leadership campaign received illegal foreign funding with the claim that he won the nomination “fair and square.”  When Han Dong's campaign for the Liberal Party nomination in his riding was accused of getting support from China, Dong was forced out of the party, his political and personal reputation ruined . . . and he has received death threats. The accusations against Dong remain unproven.  Poilieve, despite proof of foreign interference in his nomination campaign,  has waved off the accusations as being of no consequence. 

Then There's fentanyl

When Donald Drumph launched his trojan-horse claims of fentanyl crossing the border form Canada into the USA (yes, yes, we all know now that more fentanyl moves the other way), Poilieve tried to jump on that horse-drawn bandwagon by announcing that he would impose mandatory sentences of life in prison for anyone caught with 40 milligrams of fentanyl.  Do you know how small a milligram is?  Fentanyl is an incredibly powerful and easily produced synthetic drug.  (The Reuters web page explains what we should know and need to know about fentanyl.)  Two milligrams of fentanyl is a potentially lethal dosage  The drug is deadly, but the campaign promise came across as flawed, failed opportunism pandering to Donald Trump.

Then there's Carney

With the change in Liberal leadership, a new Prime Minister, and a new political opponent, it seemed that Poilieve's existence had lost its meaning.  Slowly he came to realize that changing the names from Trudeau to Carney, accompanied by satanic-looking videos of Carney awash in red just weren't going to cut it, he pivoted back to the guilt-by-innuendo that he had used to discredit David Johnson.  Poilieve announced what he hoped would seem a scandalous revelation that when Mark Carney was a private citizen representing Brookfield, the Canadian asset management company (Poilieve holds investments n the same company by the way), Carney visited the vice-president of the Chinese central bank, "two weeks later Brookfield got a quarter-billion-dollar loan."  There are only two possible interpretations of these scandalous revelations: 1) these two events happened one after the other and are completely unrelated or 2) Mark Carney has shown that he can negotiate a deal with China, Canada’s second largest trading partner, which is beneficial to Canada and Canadians.  Who is Poilieve campaigning for?  Then he uses the press conference (above) for some out-of-date China bashing. Is Poilieve seriously trying to escalate our trade war with China while we are in the midst of a trade war with the USA?

Listening to Poilieve trying to spin yet another conspiracy theory, it occurred to me that maybe this is the advantage of not having a security clearance.  Since he doesn’t know anything, he can just make stuff up without being accused of lying.

Then the worst happened:  Danielle Smith

If nothing else sinks Poilieve’s campaign, Danielle Smith’s attempt to support him by telling Breibart News that Poilieve is “in sync with the new US administration” should do it.

Signs of Desperation

I can’t think of anything more desperate than the Conservative campaign’s attempt to turn a sound bit of Trump describing Poilieve as acting “stupidly” as evidence that Poilieve is the man we want as Prime Minister.

How Has Canada Ended Up in Trade Wars with China and the USA at the Same Time?

Here’s the chronology:

2015. The Justin Trudeau Liberals were elected with a plan to establish a free-trade agreement with China

2016.  Donald Trump was elected President of the USA and begins direct trade negotiations with Xi Jinping of China

2016-2017:  Plans for a Canada-China free-trade agreement are underway.

2018:  In January, Richard Donoghue, a lawyer working for Broadcom, becomes District Attorney for the Eastern District of New York

2018:  March 1, President Trump announces his intention to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian steel

2018:  In April, John Bolton becomes President Trump’s National Security Advisor

2018:  In October, Canada, USA and Mexico formally agree to the new NAFTA, the USMCA free-trade agreement which includes the “China clause” intended to block Canada from creating a free-trade agreement with China

2018:  December 1, John Bolton sets up a meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping which he sarcastically describes as his “contribution to world peace.”  On the same day, under Bolton’s direction the FBI instructs Canadian Border Secrurity and the RCMP to  arrest Meng Wanzou the CFO and daughter of the founder of Huawei, the largest supplier of telecommunications equipment in the world, based on a warrant issued by Richard Donoghue.

2018-2019:  The Extradition Act is clear that the decision to extradite or release Meng is up to the Minister of Justice, Jody Wilson Raybould, after she has reviewed all the circumstances and determined if the request is fair or not.   Wilson Raybould issues a statement saying she takes her extradition responsiblities seriously but before she can do more she is demoted out of Justice for refusing to interfere in the prosecution of the engineering firm SNC Lavalin.  Wilson Raybould subsequently resigns.  The Lavalin scandal creates confusion because by law the Minister of Justice is not supposed to interfere in a case like SNC Lavalin but, by law, the Minister is supposed to decide the extradition case.  This difference never seemed to make its way to the Canadian public.

2018:  December 10, after the Canadian government had broken every law in the books including denial of  habeas corpus and ignoring the Canadian Extradition Act in the process of arresting Meng, the Chinese government followed suit and arrested Canadians Michael Korvik and Michael Spavor without just cause.  The Chinese government also began to restrict imports of Canadian produce and stalled plans to establish a Covid-vaccine laboratory in Canada--essentially initiating the Canada-China trade war which continues today.  Rather than releasing Meng, whom we now know was being held without justifiable cause, and arranging the release of the "two Michaels," the Canadian government in obedience and acquiescence to US policy continued to escalate tensions with China.

2020:  Weaponizing Human Rights, 24 hours before leaving office, Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo declared that China was committing genocide against the Uyghur population of Xinjiang. At least three reports were published accusing China of genocide and were extensively quoted in the press.  The newly appointed US Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken repeated Pompeo's claim of a genocide but made no official declaration.  In the UN's Assessment of human rights concerns in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China published in August, 2022, the word "genocide" never appears.

2021:  January 21, the Canadian House of Commons passed a non-binding resolution proposed by Erin O'Toole that China was perpetrating a genocide against its Muslim population.

2021:  December 23,  the US Congress passes the Forced Labour Act which requires Border Security to reject all imports from China that might be the result of forced labour unless there is clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.  In keeping with the recently negotiated USMCA free trade agreement, Canada is required to do the same thereby further escalating a trade war with China.

2024:  October 1, Canada imposed a 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles, again to align itself with US policy, and once again escalating a trade war with China.

2025:  January 20, Donald Trump is inaugurated as US President and announces a 25% tariff on Canadian imports, effectively reneging on the USMCA.  Nonetheless Canada continues to impose its 100% tariff on Chinese vehicles. 

2025:  China retaliates with 100% tariffs on Canadian canola, seafood and pork.  

Just a thought:  maybe we shouldn't have arrested Meng in the first place.

   

In the Midst of Canada's Existential Crisis, Alberta Premier, Danielle Smith, Escalates Hostilities with Canada's Federal Government.

 This is cut and paste from Edmonton Journal.

Smith targets ‘unconstitutional federal overreach' with new Alberta legislation

“These amendments we're introducing today would include denying federal workers access to our facilities and the information they contain."

Author of the article:

Jackie Carmichael

Published Mar 19, 2025  •  4 minute read

222 Comments

New legislation will set the province as gatekeeper of emissions information about Alberta’s energy industry, banning federal workers’ “interference” from collecting Alberta emissions data.

Premier Danielle Smith on Wednesday pushed back against the federal emissions cap and what she called “unconstitutional federal overreach.”

Since the province owns the resources it licenses to companies to extract, it’s the only source that counts, Smith said.

Bill 45’s changes to the Critical Infrastructure Defence Act were tabled Wednesday.

“These amendments we’re introducing today would include denying federal workers access to our facilities and the information they contain,” she said.

The legislation designates oil and gas production sites and facilities where emissions data and records are held as “essential infrastructure.”

“This amendment to the Critical Infrastructure Defence Act provides an extra tool to safeguard essential infrastructure from interference, and that includes interference from Ottawa,” Smith said, referencing Section 92 of the Canadian constitution, “which gives the province, not the federal government, the exclusive jurisdiction over non-renewable natural resource development.”

No ‘single source truth for emissions data’

Conflicting conclusions between federal and provincial numbers has been a problem, Smith said, citing methane emission calculations by the province versus the federal government.

“Well, this is part of the issue is that we don’t have a single source of truth for emissions data,” she said.

“If we’re going to have these kinds of disputes, we know that there needs to be a single source of truth when it comes to actual on-site data, and we’re going to collect that, and then we’ll make sure that it is shared,” she said.

“We believe that, because the federal government has come up with different numbers at different times for their own purposes, we think that we actually need to get real data, and because we’re the ones on the ground, we’ll be the ones able to do that work. This bill doesn’t explicitly ban initial data reporting by private companies to the federal government. They will report to us, it’s our data, and then we will report to the federal government. Remember the energy companies, especially since we own the resource and we permit the resource, they develop the resource on our behalf. And so in doing so, we have an obligation to collect the data, and we’ll report it to the to the federal government,” she said.

Hiking production and pipelines

In the same announcement, Smith reinforced prior commitments to upping oil and gas extraction, and pipeline construction east, west and north. 

“Alberta will continue in its pursuit of doubling our oil and gas production to meet the growing global demand for energy, and we will not let Ottawa stand in our way. We will not tolerate the continuous unconstitutional overreaches made by the Federal Liberal government measures like the emissions cap, the net zero electricity regs, the net zero electric vehicle mandate. And the energy industry advertising ban must be stopped now,” Smith said.

The legislation comes at a time of transition as Prime Minister Mark Carney assumed leadership last week after Justin Trudeau resigned.

Smith invoked the recent escalating tariff wars started by U.S. President Donald Trump as proof that “now more than ever that Canada must build big and build fast to reach new global markets for export.”

“Canadians and politicians from across the country are calling for new pipelines to be built east, west and north to secure our future and end our reliance upon our southern trading partner,” she said.

Her comments came with shades of warning for the newly sworn-in Carney.

“However, if the new prime minister wants to resume an old fight, well, we will. We’ll fight tooth and nail, because if we can’t make these decisions and build when it’s so obvious and it’s so obviously in the national interest, then what kind of an economic future does Canada have? Today’s amendments are a warning, but they’re also an invitation to Ottawa. Let’s talk. Let’s rise to the occasion. Let’s use Canada’s riches to protect our nation,” she said.

Premier Danielle Smith defends Florida speaking trip as anti-tariff effort

 Cut and paste from Calgary Herald.  BTW, Prager U is not a university.  It is a propaganda tool of right -wing American conservatives.  Largely financed by the KOCH brothers who own the American refinery that processes most of Alberta's oil.  See Foreign Interference in Canadian Elections.

Postmedia Calgary , Noah Brennan

Sun, March 16, 2025 at 7:32 PM EDT·4 min read

Alberta’s premier says her upcoming speaking appearance with conservative media personality Ben Shapiro is a continuation of the necessary “quiet diplomacy” she’s employed to gain the attention of U.S. President Donald Trump amid a heated trade war.

Danielle Smith has faced calls to cancel her advertised attendance at the March 27 fundraiser for Florida-based PragerU.

Shapiro is the outspoken co-founder of conservative media company The Daily Wire and former editor-in-chief of Breitbart News. He’s drawn criticism for past homophobic remarks and more recent posts supporting Canada becoming the 51st American state.

On her call-in radio show Saturday, Smith said it’s important she speak with those who have the president’s attention.

“You talk to the influencers. That’s the key insight that people should see,” Smith said.

“I can yell from the rooftops here all that I want, but it’s far more influential for someone close to the president, that he respects, making the same case for us.”

Tickets for the “East Coast Gala” are being sold for US$1,500.

Lori Williams, a political science professor at Mount Royal University, says Smith’s upcoming appearance with Shapiro differs from her past engagements with figures like Tucker Carlson or Jordan Peterson for a couple of reasons.

One distinction, Williams said, is that the event where Smith will share the stage with Shapiro is a fundraiser in support of PragerU.

Williams also highlighted Shapiro’s recent social media posts suggesting Canada should become the 51st U.S. state, noting that Smith’s participation at the conference places her alongside someone who appears to disrespect Canadian sovereignty at a politically sensitive time.

“When we take Canada, you will be expelled to Panama to work the canal,” Shapiro posted on X in response to a post made by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in January.

Sharing the stage with Shapiro is “something that’s not going to sit well with most Canadians,” Williams said. “Even in her base, I think there are a lot of patriotic Canadians who aren’t going to particularly like the idea of her appearing to take too lightly … disrespect for Canada’s sovereignty.”

As for Smith’s claim that Shapiro has influence with Donald Trump, Williams is skeptical.

“I don’t know that that particular argument works very well,” she said. “Even though Shapiro seems to be embracing Trump’s position on the 51st state rhetoric … he has spoken out against the tariffs on Canada. So I have no idea if Donald Trump is listening to anybody.”

Williams noted it’s become “very difficult” and “exceedingly unpredictable” to know who Trump listens to and communicates with.

“(Trump’s) advisors say something isn’t going to happen and it does, or they say something is going to happen and it (doesn’t),” Williams said.

Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi last week urged Smith to cancel the appearance, saying it would be “despicable” for her to speak at the Florida event.

“These are not the kind of people that Albertans want her associating with,” Nenshi told reporters.

Smith reiterates support of ‘proportionate’ approach to tariffs

Smith said it’s important she and other opponents of tariffs address the likes of Shapiro — who has millions of followers on social media — and PragerU, who have spoken out against tariffs imposed by Trump.

“They think that tariffing Canada is dumb. They were very open about that and I want to be able to make sure that entire audience of influencers has all of my talking points so they can be making them every single place that they can so we can get to the finish line, which is tariff-free relationship on every product,” Smith said.

Asked why she has not offered a more aggressive response to U.S. tariffs, as Ontario Premier Doug Ford has, Smith reiterated her support of a measured, “proportionate” approach.

Ford threatened last week to slap an added 25 per cent charge on Ontario’s electricity exports to three northern U.S. states. Trump responded by declaring he’d double steel and aluminum duties on Canada, leading Ford to drop his proposed surcharge.

Trump went ahead Wednesday with an additional 25 per cent import tariff on all steel and aluminum imports into the U.S., including from Canada.

Trump placed 25 per cent tariffs on some products coming from Canada and Mexico in early March — and 10 per cent on energy — while pausing others for 30 days.

Smith has repeatedly resisted calls — including from Ford — to consider Alberta’s energy exports as a retaliatory bargaining chip in the ongoing trade dispute.

“If you come to a gun fight with a knife, you really are going to be at the bad end of that,” she said.

“The Americans have more levers to cause harm in an energy war, particularly to Ontario and Quebec. They may not realize that I’m defending them but I absolutely am. You just don’t mess with energy.”

— With files from The Canadian Press

Why Are We Canadians Causing a Trade War with China at this Moment

Cut and paste from CBC 

Sask. premier warns that Chinese tariffs on canola would be ruinous

Alexander Quon, Chris Edwards | CBC News | Posted: March 12, 2025 5:39 PM | Last Updated: 17 hours ago

Premier Scott Moe also took aim at 25 per cent U.S. steel tariffs

Image | Scott Moe - SARM 2025

Caption: Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe warned of the threat posed by Chinese counter tariffs on canola. The 100 per cent tariff is set to kick in March 20, 2025. (Chanss Lagaden/CBC News)

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe lashed out at American and Chinese tariffs on Wednesday, saying they will have a devastating impact on Saskatchewan workers.

"Make no mistake — a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese canola and meal exports, alongside the challenge that we're seeing in the United States with the on and off again tariffs on various products, will decimate the canola industry in Saskatchewan," Moe said at the annual Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities (SARM) conference in Saskatoon on Wednesday.

"Immediately. In a matter of a number of weeks, not months."

China has announced that it will impose 100 per cent retaliatory tariffs targeting canola, as well as other Canadian goods like seafood and pork.

The decision comes in response to Canada's 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles and a 25 per cent levy on Chinese aluminum and steel products imposed on Oct. 1.

The Chinese tariffs are scheduled to kick in on March 20, just a day after the Saskatchewan budget is set to be introduced in the provincial legislature.

"I'm not sure you're going to hear the budget speak specifically to this, but you're gonna hear the Saskatchewan government speak specifically to this," Moe said.

The premier said no one wants to buy Chinese electric vehicles in Canada, and moving to protect Canadian and American car industries is directly harming agriculturally-based provinces like Saskatchewan.

• Saskatchewan farmers brace as China imposes tariffs on crops

• Sask. gov to stick with U.S. booze and materials pause after Trump postpones tariffs

Moe's ire was not just focused on the incoming Canola tariffs. On Wednesday morning, 25 per cent tariffs on all imports of steel and aluminum to the United States officially came into force.

In response, the Canadian government announced a new set of 25 per cent tariffs on $29.8 billion worth of American imports. They include $12.6 billion worth of steel products, $3 billion worth of aluminum products and $14.2 billion worth of other goods. They are ti go into effect at 12:01 a.m. EDT on Thursday.

Those new tariffs are on top of the federal government's first retaliatory tariffs announced earlier this month, which applied to $30 billion worth of American goods and are to be increased to $155 billion at the end of March. The federal government said they will remain in place until all American tariffs are lifted.

Moe confirmed that Saskatchewan's retaliatory measures announced last week will also remain in place. They include blocking the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (SLGA) from buying and distributing U.S.-made alcohol, and pausing future government capital projects to assess how American contractors and suppliers could be minimized.

"Things are changing literally by the hour," Moe said. "And we've seen that over the course of the last number of weeks. So a calm hand is necessary."

Image | Saskatchewan NDP Shadow Minister for Economy and Jobs Aleana Young

Caption: Saskatchewan NDP economy and jobs critic Aleana Young says the Sask. Party hasn't done enough to stand up for steel workers. (Krik Fraser)

Aleana Young, the Saskatchewan NDP's economy and jobs critic, said at a separate news conference in Regina on Wednesday that the government should prioritize Canadian steel manufacturers.

"Stop using steel from outside of Canada, stop using cheap Chinese steel, stop using U.S. companies when it comes to building projects here in Saskatchewan," Young said.

More than half of Saskatchewan's exports go to the United States, totalling about $26.7 billion in 2024. About three quarters of those were from one of four products: crude oil, potash, canola oil and uranium.

According to Statistics Canada, in 2024 Saskatchewan exported $387 million worth of iron and steel products and $26 million worth of aluminum to the United States.

Regina is home to one of 13 steel plants in Canada. It's run by Ervaz plc, a steel manufacturing and mining company based in the United Kingdom.

According to United Steelworkers Local 5890 President Mike Day, about 30 per cent of the steel produced at the facility is shipped to a sister plant in the U.S.

"Right now everything is up in the air and we don't know what the next move is," said Patrick Veinot, a staff representative for United Steelworkers. "It's important that we get together and we discuss it. All parties, all stakeholders. That includes finance, that includes business, that includes the unions, you know, as organized labour.

"Everybody needs to sit at a table and discuss this."

Cut and paste from  the Toronto Star

Canada is caught in a ‘double trade war’ — and one premier is urging Ottawa to drop its fight against China

On top of threatened U.S. tariffs, China has brought down another hammer on many Canadian farm and seafood exports.

Updated 3 hrs ago

March 10, 2025

4 min read

Save

B.C. Premier David Eby speaks to reporters from his office following the throne speech at the legislature in Victoria on Feb. 18, 2025.

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chad Hipolito

---

By Tonda MacCharlesOttawa Bureau Chief

OTTAWA — On top of threatened U.S. tariffs, China has brought down another hammer on many Canadian farm and seafood exports, hitting them with a “double trade war” that industry leaders say will slam Canadian producers.

In response, B.C. Premier David Eby called on Ottawa to drop its tariff fight against China, saying Canada got nothing out of trying to align trade policy with the United States last fall ahead of President Donald Trump’s election.

Eby, who stepped up measures against the United States along with Ontario Premier Doug Ford on Monday, said the government of Canada should offer a concession in the trade dispute it has with China.

“The president has been completely indifferent to our policy towards China, and in fact, he doesn’t seem to have any designs on treating Canada better than China.” In fact, he said, Trump is “coming after Canada far more aggressively than he is the government of China.“

I think it will be necessary for the federal government to have a look at tariff policy with respect to trading partners around the world, understanding that we don’t want to get crushed between the two biggest economies in the world — the American and the Chinese economies — and ensuring we’re diversifying around the world.”In October, Canada matched U.S. tariffs against Chinese imports, imposing 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, and 25 per cent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports. When the tariffs on China were announced at a cabinet retreat, the Trudeau government made clear it was moving in lockstep with the Americans against Chinese “overcapacity.”

Beijing responded several months later, announcing on Saturday that it will levy a 100 per cent tariff on more than $1 billion worth of Canadian canola oil, meal and pea imports, and a 25 per cent duty on $1.6 billion worth of Canadian aquatic products and pork.

”We can’t survive a double trade war with our two largest trading partners,” said Kyle Larkin, head of the Grain Growers of Canada, which represents about 70,000 grain farmers. 

The Chinese tariffs open a new front that will put even more pressure on the sector at a time when U.S. tariff threats, though temporarily paused, have rattled markets and led to a drop in commodity prices, Larkin said in an interview.

Silo operators are already starting to reject grain farmers trying to drop off their canola, he said. That has a domino effect on the cash flow of farmers who operate with “thin margins,” and sell grain in the fall and spring to earn cash to buy seed, fertilizer and pesticides for the upcoming growing season.

While they want Ottawa to engage with China to resolve the dispute, Larkin said the federal government — which offered $1 billion in new credit financing on Friday through Farm Credit Canada — will also have to look at higher compensation and supports for farmers.

“We’re already seeing about 1,000 to 1,500 family farms lost every year. So, you know, it’s kind of a precipitous situation that we find ourselves in right now,” said Larkin.

Michael Harvey, executive director of the Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance, said the organization had warned the Canadian government last year that it risked Chinese retaliation because Ottawa did not go through the kind of investigation that European countries undertook in line with World Trade Organization processes. 

The alliance, which represents Canadian ranchers, producers, and food processors that export products, is now calling on Ottawa to engage with China to persuade it to drop the looming tariffs

The incoming prime minister, Mark Carney, talked tough on tariffs and Trump in his victory speech after winning the Liberal leadership.

During his campaign he said he would impose “dollar-for-dollar” tariffs on the U.S. He did not repeat that threat Sunday night, but said “the Canadian government is rightly retaliating with our own tariffs that will have maximum impact in the US and minimum impact here in Canada.

“My government will keep our tariffs on until the Americans show us respect, and make credible, reliable commitments to free and fair trade. In the meantime, we will ensure that all proceeds from our tariffs will be used to protect our workers,” he said.

On Monday, the prime minister-designate spoke with Ford about the tariff fight.

Ford told Bloomberg TV that Carney is “right in line with what I believe in” when it comes to dealing with Trump.

Despite the U.S. tariffs being temporarily paused until April 2, provinces are acting.

Ontario slapped a promised 25 per cent export tariff on electricity shipped to the U.S. on Monday, and B.C. removed all American liquor from provincially run stores, not just those from “red” states where Republicans are in power. 

Eby is now preparing legislation to allow B.C. to levy tariffs on American cars travelling through Canada en route to Alaska, and has recommended similar tariffs on American thermal coal shipments that transit through Canada to reach shipping routes to Asian markets. 

Former prime minister Jean Chrétien told Liberals Sunday night that governments of all stripes in Canada should consider responding to U.S. tariffs with export tariffs on Canadian oil, gas, potash, steel, aluminum and electricity shipped to the U.S.

Ford said Alberta Premier Danielle Smith should slap export tariffs on her province’s oil exports south of the border, like he did with electricity.

“You want to talk about a trump card that will instantly change the game,” said Ford. “The Americans, all of a sudden their gas prices go up 90 (cents) to a dollar a gallon, they will lose their minds.” He urged Smith not to be shy about it as the trade war continues. “We need to at least put that in the window.”

Smith adamantly rejected that notion again Monday.

In a news conference in Beijing earlier Monday, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said China’s move is justified because Canada disregarded its arguments against EVs.

“Canada has insisted on taking discriminatory restrictive measures on some Chinese imports. This seriously violates WTO rules, disrupts normal trade order, and gravely harms China’s lawful rights and interests. The countermeasures China has taken are fully necessary, justified, reasonable and lawful.”

Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly is urging New Canadian Liberal party leader Mark Carney to take a strong stance on tariffs imposed by the United States under the Trump administration. (AP Video / March 10, 2025)

With files from Robert Benzie

Tonda MacCharles is Ottawa Bu